Industrial Engineering
CONVENTIONAL VS. MODULAR DESIGN
COMPARISON STUDY
Modular and conventional planning in comparison
In order to better understand the full potential of the digitales bauen® planning method, a comparative study was performed using a completed and well-documented, conventional project as the basis. Measurable criteria of the two planning methods were compared.
The project was a newly constructed 30,000 sqm, 4-storey administrative building with a ground level customer service hall, office levels, and an underground parking garage.
On the basis of a representative plan
For the comparative study, a segment of the building was specified. This consisted of a 1,000 sqm zone on the 4th level of the building and served as a good representation for the entire building. Comparable area to this cross-section occur approximately ten times in the structure.
Project Data
Client
GTE Gebäude- und Elektrotechnik GmbH Mannheim
Property
New administration building
Gross Total Area
30,000 sqm
Service Period
2008
Compare Complexity
Conventional Planning
Modular Planning
Comparison of Labor Costs
Conventional Planning
Modular Planning
![digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_integrationsplan_1200](https://en.digitales-bauen.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_integrationsplan_1200.jpg)
Conventional Building Services Plan
![digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_integrationsplan2_1200](https://en.digitales-bauen.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_integrationsplan2_1200.jpg)
Integrated Modular Building Services Plan in the digitales bauen Method
![digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_erfahrungskurve_1200](https://en.digitales-bauen.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/digitales_bauen_vergleichsstudie_erfahrungskurve_1200.jpg)
Modules Catalogue
digital planning, constructing
and operating
digitales bauen
Augartenstrasse 1
76137 Karlsruhe
Germany
+49 721 266756 10
info@digitales-bauen.de
© digitales bauen 2024
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy